On This Day
1389: Ottoman sultan Murad I defeats the Serbs at the Battle of Kosovo, a key event in Serbian national history.
The BBC.
I was doing a 'conversation' session on Wednesday - based (at the request of one of the participants) on a set of programmes from the BBC Learning English programme, Talk about English.
The series (excellent) is called, 'Who on Earth are we?' - and has a basis in the idea of culture and how it affects communication.
We started to examine the idea of stereotypes and got on to the question of what stereotypes people thought there were about Romanians. Our discussion moved into the topic of religion, never very safe at the best of times.
Life got a little warm, but not too heated - the biggest issue being over the peaceful nature of the Orthodox religion in Romania.
I decline, at this point, to address that.
After the discussion, I thought about posting a few comments on the effects of religion on the 'cultural identity' of people.
However, seeing as I regard statements in the English classroom as more confessional than those delivered to your average psychiatrist (at least you are concious of what you are saying on the couch, and in some control of the language you are using) I decided against it - and preserved the integrity of Babel, once again.
However, the issue has been simmering - and when, today, the Beeb pop up with the Kosovo Battle - it spills over.
Take a look at this choice piece of writing:
On June 28, 1389, a mighty battle was fought at Kosovo Polje. It pitted the Serbian defenders of Christ's holy cross against the invading Ottoman Empire (Turkey) adherents of the Muslim crescent moon.
This is from a piece from 'Truthmedia' - welcome to 1984 'newspeak' in reality.
I think the idea of combining crude nationalism and divisive religious views can find no better expression (I also guess the writers of this 'truth' wouldn't even notice they'd done it).
I've blogged before on nationalism and patriotism - on the difference between loving the state and loving the land.
Unfortunately, religion has been dragged in on the side of the state - and that leads to an intensification of conflict.
It doesn't have to be - the English (after beating each other to death and burning a few people) finally settled to a religion which, at its best, fitted the land: Anglicanism is a now dated celebration of getting on with the farming and not messing around with the harvest.
It's whole principle is the reduction of religion to being servant of the people, not the other way round - and if the sate is going to be involved (and, boy, is it involved in the Anglican Church!) it is only to make sure the religion stays firmly in it's place - Sunday morning, and a couple of rites of passage.
God and you are friends on personal terms - you don't need a man in silly clothes to interfere between you - and the buildings are nice too.
Not so I'm afraid with other nations - they take their gods far too seriously - look at the state America gets in!
And don't forget, that is a place which believes in the separation of religion from the state!
Newspeak!
If there was to be a 'new-speak' in Orwell's totalitarian world, there must have been an 'Oldspeak'.
Fortunately, Kosovo has managed to produce an adherant to Oldspeak as well as countless adherents to the destruction of words.
Ismail Kadare
You may, or may not have heard of the Albanian author - he has something of a reputation.
For the purposes of this little excursion, he wrote perhaps the sanest book on the events in Kosovo over 600 years ago:
Three Elegies for Kosovo.
(Amazon uk)
Technorati Tags: BBC, Kosovo, religion, Timisoara, Romania, Babel, USA
Powered by ScribeFire.
1 comment:
I finally found one of your blogs.
Actually I don't like talking about religion in Romania due to the not so "peaceful nature" of it. It is very peaceful until the priest expects "compensation" after every little service that he did for you.
And you should see in the villages how a priest is thrown out of the church by the villagers (especially by the elderly) because of some different apparently good reasons.
The not so very peaceful thing that I heard , was that those people who actually didn't let the priest to get in the church, all died in the next year. Strange....
As for cultural implications, in big cities religion doesn't play important roles but in small towns or villages, I think, the priest is more important than the mayor.
Anyway, we have a saying:"Do what the priest says, not what he does"
ACinTHEshed
Post a Comment